"We're challenging things that we think should never have been let go to the District Court," said the attorney, Gabriel Grasso.
Grasso filed court papers Thursday claiming prosecutors didn't meet the evidentiary standards to prosecute the former football star on six of the 12 charges against him.
"They're charging O.J. with ... the specific intent to commit robbery," Grasso said, citing Nevada law underlying the felony charge of robbery.
"He wasn't stealing from somebody else. He was taking back something that was his."
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/02/01/simpson.charges.ap/index.html
No comments:
Post a Comment